
Ok it wasn’t really a fight…more of a disagreement as to why he needs to eat meat. I simply told him about some scientific truths and facts and how it could benefit him. He shot back at me with references about all sorts of studies etc. I didn’t realize he’d come so prepared so I asked why he had all these books and studies (years and all) memorized and he said he gets ‘attacked’ for his eating habits all the time. I then asked if he thought that might be some sort of red flag and he didn’t answer.
Anyway, one of his go-back-to’s was this book called “The China Study”. Apparently it is some sort of earth shattering research on why we should all eat vegan - actually raw vegan I think…I didn’t get into it too deep standing at the book store. Rather than try to explain the whole thing I’ll paste the synopsis:
“Referred to as the “Grand Prix of epidemiology” by The New York Times, this study examines more than 350 variables of health and nutrition with surveys from 6,500 adults in more than 2,500 counties across China and Taiwan, and conclusively demonstrates the link between nutrition and heart disease, diabetes, and cancer. While revealing that proper nutrition can have a dramatic effect on reducing and reversing these ailments as well as curbing obesity, this text calls into question the practices of many of the current dietary programs, such as the Atkins diet, that are widely popular in the West. The politics of nutrition and the impact of special interest groups in the creation and dissemination of public information are also discussed.”
It pretty much explains the negatives of protein and that by removing it you can stop cancer and diabetes and autoimmune disorders and blah blah blah. I know, thats great right?! What do you mean you’ve never heard of the book? Its a breakthrough, surely you must have missed the news that all disease is over now and you should stop eating protein. OF COURSE YOU HAVEN’T HEARD THAT ON THE NEWS BECAUSE ITS ALL A BUNCH OF CRAP!
I spent a whopping 0.3 seconds (according to Google) and found literally thousands of people - many of them legit researchers - that called bullshit on this book. I read quite a few in favor of the book (all vegans) and probably just as many that were against - there were exponentially more in the against category.
Here are a couple entries worth noting:
“It’s no surprise “The China Study” has been so widely embraced within the vegan and vegetarian community: It says point-blank what any vegan wants to hear—that there’s scientific rationale for avoiding all animal foods. That even small amounts of animal protein are harmful. That an ethical ideal can be completely wed with health. These are exciting things to hear for anyone trying to justify a plant-only diet, and it’s for this reason I believe “The China Study” has not received as much critical analysis as it deserves, especially from some of the great thinkers in the vegetarian world.”
“The China Study” is a compelling collection of carefully chosen data. Unfortunately for both health seekers and the scientific community, Campbell appears to exclude relevant information when it indicts plant foods as causative of disease, or when it shows potential benefits for animal products. This presents readers with a strongly misleading interpretation of the original China Study data, as well as a slanted perspective of nutritional research from other arenas (including some that Campbell himself conducted).”
“I also love the observation that, despite his constant whining about the “dangers of reductionism” in science, Campbell’s entire argument against animal protein really hinges on a strongly reductionist experiment, namely the isolated effect of casein fed to rats in large doses. Snap!”
“It seems Campbell never took the critical step of accounting for other disease-causing variables that tend to cluster with higher-cholesterol counties in the China Study—variables like schistosomiasis infection, industrial work hazards, increased hepatitis B infection, and other non-nutritional factors spurring chronic conditions. Areas with lower cholesterol, by contrast, tended to have fewer non-dietary risk factors, giving them an automatic advantage for preventing most cancers and heart disease. (The health threats in the lower-cholesterol areas were more related to poor living conditions, leading to greater rates of tuberculosis, pneumonia, intestinal obstruction, and so forth.)”
“One thing you’ll never hear Campbell mention, nor have I seen other China Study skeptics come across, is the health of one unique county in China called Tuoli. Unlike the rest of China, the Tuoli ate 40% of their diet as fat, ate 134 grams of animal protein per day (twice as much as the average American), and rarely ate vegetables or other plant foods. According to the China Study data, these people were extremely healthy with low rates of cancers and heart disease… healthier, in fact, than many of the counties that were nearly vegan. (No big shocker there, but it’s something Campbell completely ignores.)”
I stole the list below off someone else’s blog (I apologize to that person as I copied and pasted and then couldn’t refind his page - I had way too many open at once and then froze up) so I’ll post it here if you want to do your own reading becasue this post could get excessively LONG.
- The China Study exposed: actual data does not support vegetarian health claims (at Hunter-Gatherer)
- China Study Problems of Interpretation (at Whole Health Source)
- Polish a turd and find a diamond? (at PaNu)
- The China Study: Junk Science and Lies (at Robb Wolf)
- There is no justification for a plant-only diet (at Conditioning Research)
- Rest in peace, China Study (at The Healthy Skeptic)
- “The China Study”, Debunked (at Theory to Practice)
- “The China Study: Fact or Fallacy?” (at Let Them Eat Meat)
- Destroying China (the Study that Is) (at Aspire Natural Health)
- The China Study Discredited (at Food Renegade)
- The Study Everyone Talks About: Part 2: The Ravaging Reviews (at Feasting on Fitness)
- Debunking The China Study (at Crossfit 1776)
- The Debunking of the China Study (at TJ’s Gym)
- Thoughts on Friday from the middle of the road! (at A Moderate Life)
- A Critique Worth Reading (at For His Glory & for Our Good)
- “T. Colin Campbell’s The China Study: Finally, Exhaustively Discredited” (at Crossfit Peachtree)
- The China Study: Crushed by its Own Data (at The Spark of Reason)
- China Study & T. Colin Campbell: Someone just made you their vegan bitch (at Paleo-ish)
- The China Study: Evidence for the Perfect Health Diet (at Perfect Health Diet)
- The China Study Has No Clothes: Smackdown Of T. Colin Campbell (at Nutrition and Physical Regeneration)
- The slam-dunking of “The China Study” (at the shmaltz)
- China Study Shakedown (at Natural Messiah)
- The China Study Toppled – A Tale of the Confirmation Bias (at Lean, Mean, Virile Machine)
- Slaying of a Hypothesis (at Animal Pharm)
- “Epidemiology is Bogus” (at Evolutionary Psychiatry)
- China Study Unveiled — Not Supporting Veganism (at Primal Wisdom)
- China fiction? (at The Heart Scan Blog)
- The China Study - A Superb Analysis (at Primal Muse)
- Chipping Away at the China Study (at Liberation Wellness)
- The China study: Debunked (at Food, flora and felines)
- Buh-bye, China Study (at The Low-Carb Curmudgeon)
- China Study Debunked (at The Red Pill)
- Around the Fitness Horn (at x lyssa)
- RAW FOOD SOS sobre o China Study (at Canibais e Reis)
- Die veblüffende Biegsamkeit von Fakten: The China Study (at Urgeschmack)
- Veganbibelns fall (at Kostdoktorn.Se)
- Weekend Link Love (at Mark’s Daily Apple)
- The China Study (at Kat’s Food Blog)
- Debunking junk science: goodbye china study (at abundant brain & health)
- China Study Unmasked (at AgingBoomersBlog.com)
- Denise Minger Refutes the China Study Once and For All (at The WAPF Blog)
- “The China Study” Considered Harmful (at Metamodern)
- The China Study vs the China study (at The Blog of Michael R. Eades, M.D.)
Discuss if you bothered to check any of this out.